Jump to content
LIMITED TIME OFFER: Use code 10YEARS10 to get 10% off your Appliantology membership. Click here for more ×
Click here to check out our on-demand appliance repair training webinars.

FAQs | Repair Videos | Academy | Newsletter | Contact


DISCLOSURE: We may earn a commission when you use one of our coupons/links to make a purchase.
  • Upcoming Events

    • 27 April 2024 02:00 PM Until 03:00 PM
      0  
      All Appliantology tech members are invited to join in this workshop on all things Appliantological: bidness, customers, tools, troubleshooting, flavorite brewski, whatever. Webcams and microphones are open and live!
      This workshop is also a great time for any students at Master Samurai Tech to bring any and all questions about the coursework. We're happy to walk through any concepts you're having trouble with. Think of it like office hours with your teachers. 
      If you have a specific appliance problem you'd like us to talk about, post it here! We need a problem statement and a PDF of the tech sheet or schematic so we can all see it on screen share. If you have a PDF that isn't already in the File library here at Appliantology, send it to us by attaching it to the contact form. 
      Also, follow this Calendar Event so you'll get notified of new posts here. Look for the "Follow" button either at the top of the topic on desktop or below the topic on mobile.
      Who: This workshop is only available to tech members at Appliantology.
      When: Saturday, April 27 @10:00 AM Eastern Time.
      Where: Online via Zoom
      How:
      Click here to go to the forum topic with the registration link. If you're interested, register now. Arrive a couple minutes early to make sure your connection is working. Set a reminder for yourself for this workshop so you don’t miss it.  And check out past workshops here: https://appliantology.org/announcement/33-webinar-recordings-index-page/

Recomended Service Van/ Truck


Tuco

Recommended Posts

I 'm thinking of purchasing a used AWD Chevy Astro Cargo van.  Do you think this is large enough?

AWD is for the ice in winter.

What do you like or use, what van works good?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Team Samurai

If you live up north, AWD is a must... unless you wanna carry around a bag of sand and snow shovel in your van.

I have a Chevy Express 1500 AWD, full shelving package. More than enough room. I think an Astro would work but you may be tweeking your inventory more often.

Been eyeballing those Dodge Sprinters, too. I know a few other techs who run those and them absolutely love 'em.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello, Tuco, my large enough friend. May I suggest you go Green and use a yak. "Ah," you say, "but yaks produce methane and so cannot be considered Green." Touché, my friend! But if you have ever been at the receiving end of yak flatulence, you will come to appreciate the true meaning of Green.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kind sounds like me after a feed of Barbecued Ribs and Red Wine - could gag a maggot !

Perhaps I could figure a way to supercharge the Ford Transit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Samurai . I live in Alaska and have been doing some part time handyman work, but am trying to go more into appliance repair. I need some kind of van to get out of the weather and get my small inventory out of my garage

.

Moostafa, I like the way you think, but I need a more practical solution for my locality. But I guess if the yak angered me, I could enjoy a 3 day BBQ with friends and family.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what is the best way to grill yak ribs ??? out here in the north west, I have an astro van.....002-7.jpg butI do not have ice and snow or Palenism to worry about..... plenty of room to carry parts and it helps if you ask the customer the complaint/ the problem   first,,,,to have the part on the van...............

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[user=45]Moostafa[/user] wrote:

Hello, Tuco, my large enough friend. May I suggest you go Green and use a yak. "Ah," you say, "but yaks produce methane and so cannot be considered Green." Touché, my friend! But if you have ever been at the receiving end of yak flatulence, you will come to appreciate the true meaning of Green.

Moostafa "<3" Yaks

Sniffin farts, carring parts

Cool ride, dung mound thrives

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Currently on my 3rd box truck (a real "green" vehicle too).

'04 Chevy Express 3500 dually cutaway 6.0 gas engine.

Twelve ft bed/box.

Side door & rear doors to enter/exit rear box. Inside full length door to access box from cab. Small desk & library and full shelving.

Stocked inventory that would give Marcone a run for the money...

Had everything else before current set-up. Once you get to this level of TOTAL service truck---you'll NEVER go back.

Pickups

Large Vans

Medium Vans

Compact Vans

Nope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I totally despise the Chevrolet Astro/GMC Safari vans. They are all JUNK. I've driven 4 of them and they all have the same exact problems.

1.) All the door locks, the ignition lock and the power windows stop working,  even the key won't unlock the doors anymore.

2.) They all have problems with the blower motor. last winter I went without any heat at all and no air conditioning in the summer.

3.) The windshield wipers work when they feel like it.

4.) They eat front brake pads and rotors.

As for the Dodge Sprinters, I've seen them turn to rust. The Dodge Sprinter is no longer available at Dodge dealers, now you have to go to a Mercedes Benz dealer and buy a Mercedes Benz Sprinter Van.

I like the Ford Transit Connect, looks very promising, but there is no comaprision for the Ford Econoline full size van. The Econoline is the king of cargo vans in my book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I am coming at this from the automotive side, not the appliance-service side, and I half agree with Scott: the Astro/Safari vans were sloppily engineered, cheaply made, poorly built and problem-prone. Sure, they built and sold eleventy million of them, but that doesn't mean they were good, it just means Americans are satisfied with junk. Witness how many Chevrolet Cadavaliers they've sold. Witness how many Big Macs and "Chicken" McPellets they sell. Popularity does not imply quality. The only upside is that because they sold so many of them, the many repair parts you'll need will be cheap and readily available. However, you will spend an inordinate amount of time fixing the van. On top of all that, they are very uncomfortable to drive. Nowhere to put your left leg, and I say that as a regular-height 5'9" man.

I also half-disagree with Scott: the Ford E-series vans are less uncomfortable to drive than the Astro/Safari, but they are not better engineered and not better built. They are an ancient, not-very-thoughtful, inefficient design with forty years worth of thrown-on updates. Interior fittings (door handles, gear shifts, etc.) aren't well made. Electrical system problems endemic to older Ford designs (underspecced wiring, alternator fires...). If you get the diesel, you get to listen to an engine that sounds all the time as if it is taking a stinky, wet and messy metallic crap…and wonder when it actually will.

The Transit Connect is too new on these shores to have a long-term track record of what holds up and what fails on them in North America, but they are much loved in Europe where they've been on sale for many years, regularly updated meaningfully (not just superficially like the E-series). Those I know who've bought a TC really like it so far.

Those who have Sprinters seem to like them a lot; they are much more fuel efficient and maneuverable than the stone-age Ford and GM full-size vans. They don't seem to need a lot of repair but when they do need it, it's going to cost. So you have to choose whether you want to spend a lower level of money and time on a constant basis, or a higher level of money once in awhile.

The only rust issues I've seen with the Sprinters have been with vehicles that have been hit (paint scraped off down to bare metal) and not repaired—and I'm in Toronto, where even a rust-prone car's tires and turn signal lenses will rust quickly. You really get to see which cars have effectively rust-resistant design and build in Toronto—the Aerostars all disappeared long ago, one hardly ever sees an E-series/Econoline or Chev/GMC full-size van older than 1999 or so, the first fifteen years of Astro/Safari vans are gone and the later ones are rapidly going away, and believe it or don't, there are still scads of first-generation ('84-'90) Chrysler minivans in surprisingly solid shape on the roads.

Now into the realm of my particular field: The Sprinter, which is sold in North America by both Freightliner and Mercedes, has by far the best lighting system of any of these we're talking about—so what, right? Well, time not spent repairing a hit service vehicle means time spent making money with it. A vehicle with amber rear turn signals (like the Transit Connect or the Sprinter) is up to 28% less likely to be struck from behind than an otherwise identical vehicle with red ones (like all the other vehicles we're talking about here). A vehicle with side turn signal repeaters (Transit Connect or Sprinter) is I-don't-recall-how-much-but-significantly less likely to be involved in a lane-change, bicyclist, or pedestrian collision. And a vehicle with better headlamps (Sprinter) is obviously less likely to be involved in a nighttime crash than a vehicle with poorer headlamps.

If you've got mountains of money left over after you send most of it to me, John63's idea is a good one, and if I were speccing such a truck, I would not even bother looking at Ford or Dodge (oops, we're supposed to say "Ram" now); it'd be based on a Chev or GMC, probably w/diesel engine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last week I went to a GSA truck auction in hopes of purchasing a cheap, good, used cargo van.

I was quickly out bid on a 2002 AWD Chevy Asrto Cargo van with 40K miles.

Sold to the public at $7000. I was shocked how fast the price went up. ....I ‘m still looking around

Might have been a good deal, but not on my budget.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i like the look of the transit, also the cargo area you get for such a small footprint, which makes parking alot easier, however.... i could drive a new caravan into the ground every 2 years and trade it up for a new one and never come close to spending the kind of money they want for a transit

but when the snow gets heavy up here and the roads close i get my pick of calls cause most techs dont have one of these stocked with parts

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3276506/1988-suzuki-samurai-winnipeg-mb-ca

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I been lookin' at a Jeep Patriot, pretty economical, roomy enough to make work - and doubtful that you're gonna get stuck anywhere, they got some fancy transmission that is variable as opposed to gear ranges. They're pretty easy on the pocketbook too, especially if you get one WITHOUT a/c - them's just get in the way up here for the 3 times you'll use it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use a 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee for my service calls and personal use. I folded the back seat down and cut 3/4 inch plywood to fit. The back section is for tools and parts and the middle section is for extra parts or groceries or my dog, he loves the flat surface for moving side to side in his attempt to see everything out the windows. I live in northern Minnesota so this is the perfect service truck for me and I don't have the expense of 2 vehicles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you talking about the cheezy tool boxes that mount up on the edge of an actual truck bed?

Or a pickup truck with an actual UTILITY BODY.

I run a 1991 Dodge Dakota 3.9L V6 with a utility body that was factory installed on the truck.

I got it about 5 years ago with only 68,000 miles on it for $2,800, (needs a paint job very badly

but don't have anything else to use if I let it go to be painted).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or a pickup truck with an actual UTILITY BODY.

I run a 1991 Dodge Dakota 3.9L V6 with a utility body that was factory installed on the truck.

I got it about 5 years ago with only 68,000 miles on it for $2,800, (needs a paint job very badly

but don't have anything else to use if I let it go to be painted).

Yes Utility body.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Anyone own the new Nissan NV van?

If so---what are your impressions of this vehicle?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...